The city of Buenos Aires wasn’t particularly green when I
arrived in August 2015—it was the middle of winter, colder than I expected, and
most of the trees were deciduous yet decidedly leafless. Earlier that year, I
was walking through San Francisco, California with my friend Ken who pointed
out that it was all too common to find that any given street in the city was
paved with concrete from wall to wall. There were hardly any patches of bare
earth or virgin grass outside a designated park in the City by the Bay, and
Buenos Aires presented a very similar image. My new neighborhood, Palermo, was
split into several smaller areas such as Palermo Soho (charming with the
occasional cobblestone streets, featuring trendy Italian-inspired cafes in cozy
plazas) or Palermo Hollywood (auto shops, night clubs, and corporate
headquarters on less pedestrian-friendly avenues). Trees were everywhere, but I
didn’t really begin to appreciate them until the spring bloom sometime in late
October.
Around the same time as my stroll through San Francisco, I
had started a small project focusing on the urban forest of Buenos Aires. To my
delight, the city government offered a tree census in their online data repository.
This census was a table documenting the species, genus, common name, height,
address, grid coordinates, and other attributes of a few hundred thousand trees
in the city. I was able to open the data in QGIS, my computer struggling to
load all these thousands of dots stacking up on top of one another within the
borders of Capital Federal (the administrative boundary of the Autonomous City
of Buenos Aires, or CABA, and capital district of Argentina). QGIS is a
powerful open source mapping software, and it would be my primary tool as I
moved forward with my study. I changed the size of each dot that represented a
tree, and soon was able to see neat lines along the main streets with some
parts of the city more densely covered than others.
My first analysis was
to look for any connection between the density of trees and demographic data. I
found quickly that the poorer, less educated, and more immigrant-dominated
southern part of the city was nearly barren of trees in many parts. This area
included Nueva Pompeya (an industrial district) and La Boca (“the mouth”, were
the old port was built on the mouth of a river and still quite the skid row). Palermo,
a haven for expatriates (i.e., non-immigrant foreigners) like me in contrast to
less affluent immigrants in the south, was well covered. Palermo’s ritzy but
quieter neighbor to the east called Recoleta was also quite green. In the heart
of the city—really the northeast corner—Microcentro and San Telmo were also
very lacking in urban forest, but featured a wealthier resident population,
with high levels of education especially near the University of Buenos Aires
and areas dominated by foreign banks and technology headquarters (Google, for
example, is located somewhere in the overlap of San Telmo and Microcentro).
So
what to conclude? More trees tended to accompany a better standard of living
and higher socio-economic status. In addition, areas with higher proportions of
Argentine-born residents are also more densely forested, showing perhaps an
attitude of better environmental health and greenery where residents feel more
invested in the land as their past, present, and future home. These are my
theories, at the least, judging from
associations in the data.
On my arrival in Buenos Aires, I began to look at the city
under a more environmental lens than a social one. Upon my arrival, I was able
to meet with Manuel Swarcz, a middle-aged Argentinean man who was the director
of an organization called Arboles sin Fronteras (Trees without Borders). He had
overseen tree-planting projects all over the country, including in parts of
Buenos Aires. In our first meeting I explained my past research that made use
of the tree census. Manuel was quite interested,; I suggested we speak again in
another week, and so I retreated back to my Palermo apartment to ponder the
next steps over a bottle of Malbec. I created a new layer for the map that
showed not the precise location of each tree, but the density within 500 square
meter hexagons instead of in kilometer wide squares as before. Now I could see
in great detail where the urban forest was concentrated, but I still needed to
think deeper about how to make something useful out of this.
The idea came to me slowly, relating to some scientific
publications that discussed benefits of urban forest. One was the regulation of
urban temperatures, particularly combating what is known as urban heat island
(UHI) effect. It appeared that I could help Manuel by suggesting where to
target tree-planting efforts in the city in hopes of lowering temperatures and
covering the city’s bare spots with green leaves. I spent several long nights improving my
knowledge and skills, eventually being able to proficiently construct two new
map layers to accompany the tree census. Both of these layers have their origin
in NASA’s Landsat8 satellite, which takes images of every part of the earth
several times over the course of each year. I chose imagery from a clear day in
December 2014—summer in Buenos Aires—and downloaded these images in 11
different bands of light to include infrared, red, green, and blue.
In my first layer, I
depicted was is called Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). This is a
visualization of vegetation and plant presence, and can even be used to
evaluate the health of these plants by people more skilled than me. For my
purposes, I was able to create a layer that painted the map green where any
form of plant life existed in the city. The premise for this is that plant
life, especially in the green variety, reflects a certain level of radiation to
the atmosphere that can be detected by the satellite. As a result, I could
indeed see the green expanses of many parks, of the ecological reserve near
Microcentro, and other widespread locations in the city. Combined with a map of
the tree census, this allowed me to really gain insight into which parts of
Buenos Aires were truly green—and which were note. Again, the south was
lacking, the city center as well, and finally the airport and railways along
the northern stretches of the city that made up the right bank of the Rio
Plata.
My second layer showed Land Surface Temperature (LST)—an
indication of the temperature in degrees Celsius not in the air, but on the
actual ground. This comes from a similar process as calculating the NDVI.
Uncovered rock and dirt, impervious surfaces such as roads, and other man-made
structures like rooftops and runways reflect their own rather unique level of
radiation back to the satellite. This is first detected through something call
at-satellite brightness, which is converted again to degrees Kelvin and then
Celsius to be more informative for the common viewer. Adding a color gradient
to the result, I was able to find the maximum and minimum LST during that
December day, with the coolest being shown in blue, moderate temperatures in
yellow and finally the highest temperatures in orange and red.
What I expected was to find that it was visually obvious
that more trees and greenery resulted in lower temperatures. Indeed, the
airport and railway areas in the north, as well as another railway station in
the central part of the city near the Floresta neighborhood, were the color of
a hot iron as expected. Major streets were also red, in addition to other rail
lines, the sea port near La Boca, and much of the industrial south such as
Nueva Pompeya. Surprisingly, though, there were some ultra-cool spots. The Rio
Plata was blue, indicating of course that the water was a lower temperature
(it’s certainly not inviting to swim in, neither due to temperature nor its
brown color). Some other ponds and small lakes in the city were also blue.
These made sense—but then in the Floresta neighborhood, near the red hot train
station, there was a little oasis of dark blue that was unmatched anywhere else
in the city.
I went to Manuel with my latest map. The NDVI layer was
interesting to see, as it expanded the conclusion on which parts of the city
could be called green or not. The LST, however, was the true point of
conversation. Manuel put on his reading glasses and pored over my screen,
impressed to see the variation in temperatures as indicated by the rich colors.
He nodded as he looked at the airport and railways. Near the Plaza Italia
underground station in Palermo, the base layer labeled the Sociedad Rural (Rural
Society) beside what was also a dark red despite being surrounded by one of the
city’s largest, grassiest, and most forested parks.
“What could this be?” he
asked. I wasn’t sure. Then his eyes drifted to Floresta and we both furled our
brows at the dark blue. “And this?” he asked again, putting the eraser of his
pencil against the screen. I wasn’t sure about that one either, but it held
some value—in the realm of UHI, there was a more desirable effected that could
be called an urban cool island (UCI). I had hoped a density of trees and
greenery might cause this effect, but neither the tree census nor the NDVI
indicated anything special about Floresta. I left Manuel’s office again,
determined to investigate the scene of the UCI and find the cause.
The next week, my friend Aditya and I went strolling through
the center of the cool spot. It was about four by four city blocks—or manzanas
(apples), as the locals called city blocks—and faded still over several blocks
in every direction. I brought Aditya as an extra set of eyes, hoping he would
notice something I might miss. The area was dominated by sidewalk flea markets,
two- to four-story buildings, clothing shops with broad windows, and wide
streets with an unremarkable number of trees. The sun seemed to cast its light
on the streets throughout the whole day, so it wasn’t particularly shady on any
of the streets. After an hour of walking, Aditya and I were stumped. “Maybe
there was a cloud over this area when the satellite took the image,” he
suggested. I sighed, nodding and thinking that it must have been a stupid
mistake on my part.
Back behind my computer screen, I chose another clear day
that same December to convert to LST—and the cool spot was still there, in just
the same shape. This was certainly no cloud, but a persisting phenomenon. While
this news was exciting, my next meeting with Manuel left us both disappointed
at the same time. The mystery would take more time to solve, but I was
scheduled the fly back to the US in a week’s time with no plan to return
anytime soon. I mused with Manuel over how to get better insight—maybe the
elevation was significantly different in Floresta than in neighboring parts,
causing some effect on the wind. But the city was overall quite flat, we both
agreed, shaking our heads. Could there be something underground causing the
temperature to cool—perhaps a sort of cavern? There didn’t seem to be any
effect like this in the areas with underground stations, so perhaps it wasn’t
the case. Maybe an underground river, or the rooftops were comprised of some
peculiar material. Maybe the height and shape of the buildings did something to
reflect heat differently? It was all a mystery. The real question, however, was
still useful—how could we recreate this effect in the hotter parts of the city,
and make them more habitable and temperate?
The mystery still remains. UHI is an important issue being
studied around the world today, as heat waves kill more humans annually than
any other type of natural disaster or extreme weather event. Urbanization is on
the rise, with more people flocking to city centers for economic and social
reasons. Global average temperatures are also on the rise, which makes concrete
jungles even more hellish and in need of greenery. Trees and vegetation are
certainly crucial to lowering urban temperatures, especially when placed along
waterways. But what happened in the Floresta neighborhood on those December
days, and perhaps every day, may hold the key to some other advancement—a way
to go beyond just augmenting urban greenery and to more drastically lower urban
temperatures on sweltering summer days. It may be a secret that neither I nor
anyone else ever unlocks, but nonetheless it remains as a reminder of how
complex our world is despite all the technological lenses we use to study it’s
changing relationships.
No comments:
Post a Comment